Most teams think they’re covered because they have a firewall, use HTTPS, or run automated scans. But
that barely scratches the surface.
Web Application Security Testing (or Web VAPT) is a hands-on, in-depth process where we test your web
applications the way real attackers would — using a mix of automated tools and manual exploitation
techniques.
It starts with a Vulnerability Assessment: we identify weaknesses like outdated libraries, exposed
endpoints, or insecure configurations. Then we move to Penetration Testing, where we safely attempt to
exploit those weaknesses to see what an attacker could really do.
This two-part approach isn’t just for compliance—it’s how you uncover real risks before they cause real
damage.
Vulnerability Assessment → “Here’s what’s broken.”
Penetration Testing → “Here’s what someone could do with it.”
Together, they give you the full picture.
And yes, we align everything with the OWASP Top 10, so you’re covered on the industry’s most critical risk areas—from injection flaws and broken access control to misconfigurations and sensitive data exposure.
When we test your web app, we don’t start from scratch—we start with what’s proven to matter. The OWASP Top 10 is more than a checklist. It is the combined
insight of thousands of security pros around the world. And it helps us zero in on the places real attackers are most likely to hit.
Here’s how we put it into action:
Can someone access something they shouldn’t? That’s usually the first question we ask. If regular users can perform admin actions—or access another user's data—that’s a broken access control issue. It happens more often than you'd think, especially when teams rely too much on front-end controls.
Encryption’s only useful if it’s done right. We look at how sensitive data is stored and transmitted—checking for weak ciphers, expired certificates, or mistakes in how secrets are managed. A small misstep here could mean passwords or financial data getting exposed.
Some of the oldest tricks in the book still work. SQL injection, command injection, you name it—we see if your app trusts user input too much. Because if someone can craft a malicious request that your server actually executes, that’s game over.
Some problems aren’t bugs—they’re baked into how things are built. We take a step back and look at the architecture, the workflows, the logic. Is there a way to bypass critical steps? Skip from user to admin? These issues don’t show up on scanners, but they’re just as dangerous.
It could be a leftover debug tool in production. Or a server running with default settings. These “misconfigurations” might sound minor, but attackers love them—they’re easy wins. We comb through your environment to catch what’s been overlooked.
You’d be surprised how many apps are still running on versions of libraries with known exploits. We’ll map out your tech stack and highlight anything outdated—or worse, known to be vulnerable.
→ You’ll find more on this in our VAPT services breakdown.
We don’t just test passwords. We test everything around them—reset flows, session tokens, how your app handles login states. We’re looking for weak points where someone could fake being a legitimate user, or stay logged in when they shouldn’t.
→ If you're working toward SOC 2, this ties right into your compliance goals.
If your app pulls in updates, scripts, or third-party tools—can you be sure they haven’t been tampered with? We check how those things are delivered and verified. Supply chain attacks are growing, and this is where they often start.
Attacks happen. What matters is whether you see them coming—or at least know they happened. We check if logs are detailed, whether suspicious activity triggers alerts, and whether anyone’s even watching those alerts.
This one’s tricky. We test whether your app can be tricked into making requests it wasn’t supposed to—maybe to internal services, maybe to metadata endpoints. SSRF has been behind some high-profile breaches. We know what to look for.
No two apps or their risks are alike. That’s why we tailor our testing approach to match how much access you give us, and what you’re aiming to simulate.
Here’s how the three main methods work:
Not sure what makes the most sense? No worries. We’ve helped teams pick the right approach based on where they’re at—whether it’s day one of building or right before going live with a major customer.
→ You can also explore how we apply these testing styles beyond just web apps in our full-scope VAPT services.
Our process is simple on purpose. Most teams just want to know what happens, when, and what they need to be ready for. So here’s how we usually approach Web Application Security Testing:
We start with a quick conversation. You tell us what you want tested, whether it s just one app or multiple systems, and we ask questions to understand how things work behind the scenes. Once that’s clear, we draft a scope document, sign an NDA, and align on timing.
This is where we start digging. We’ll scan for subdomains, look at login endpoints, track open ports, and map out the app’s visible surface. In a lot of cases, we end up finding things the internal team didn’t know were still online.
We’ll run vulnerability scanners as a baseline, but they’re just tools. The real value comes from what we do manually— checking how the app handles broken logic, role escalation, and unusual user behavior. Our approach follows OWASP, but no two apps are alike, so we adapt. → You can explore our OWASP-based testing scope for more detail.
Once we find something, we make sure it’s real. That means testing it in context, not just copy-pasting scanner results. We want your team focused on issues that matter— not wasting time on noise.
You’ll get one report that’s easy to work with. We include the raw details your developers need, but also explain the risk in plain language—so you can use the report for audits, client reviews, or leadership check-ins without having to rewrite it.
After you’ve reviewed the findings, your devs might have questions—or maybe want a second opinion on how to fix something. We stick around for that. Quick call, async feedback, Slack messages—whatever helps your team move forward without getting stuck.
Most companies can run scans. What sets us apart is how we approach the bigger picture—how your app works, how your team operates, and what’s actually at risk.
Here’s why teams keep coming back to us:
We don’t flood your inbox with 60-page reports full of scanner noise. Instead, we zero in on the stuff that could really cause problems—whether it’s logic flaws, broken access controls, or things that make compliance a headache. Our goal isn’t to impress you with volume—it’s to surface what matters most.
You’ll have direct access to our testers. Ask questions, dig into the findings, walk through scenarios. We explain things clearly, without jargon. If your dev team needs help understanding a fix, we’re there. And if you want to present it to leadership, we’ll help frame the story right.
Some of our clients share our reports with auditors. Others use them to build roadmaps or secure buy-in from stakeholders. We format them with both technical and non-technical audiences in mind—because good security reporting should move things forward, not create more confusion.
Got a client pushing for security validation before signing a deal? Need to wrap testing up before the next sprint starts? We re used to working on tight timelines and we won t hold up your product team. We ll move quickly, without cutting corners.
You won t get junior analysts learning on your production app. Our testers have worked across startups, enterprise apps, fintech platforms, and regulated environments. We know when to raise a red flag and when to keep things practical.
Some teams call us once a year. Others bring us in every quarter. Either way, we re not just here to tick boxes—we re here to help your app grow safer over time. And we ll give you honest input, whether it benefits us or not. → Want to see how we help with compliance and client trust too? Check out our SOC 2 services.
The VAPT Team Certifications include:
You’re not just checking a box with us. When we run Web Application Security Testing, you walk away with practical documentation you can actually use—internally and externally.
Right after testing, we send over the full findings. It's not just a pile of scanner results—we tell you what we found, where it lives in your app, how risky it is, and how you can fix it. We include screenshots, proof-of-concept steps, and anything else your devs might need to start patching.
This is the document most teams open up in their sprint planning sessions.
Once your team has fixed the issues, we don’t just assume everything’s okay—we check again. Then we update the report with a status for each finding: fixed, partially fixed, or still open. A lot of clients use this version as their “shareable copy” for clients, auditors, or security reviews.
You’ll know exactly where things stand—no assumptions, no gaps.
If your app clears testing or everything gets patched, we can issue a certificate showing that security testing was done. It doesn’t mean your app is bulletproof—nothing is—but it does show that you’ve taken steps to get reviewed by a third party. Some clients add it to their trust pages or investor decks.
If you’re dealing with audits, enterprise buyers, or investor due diligence, you’ll probably need this. We’ll give you a signed letter confirming what was tested, when it was done, and how we did it. No fluff—just the essentials your stakeholders actually care about.
→ If you're working toward SOC 2 or ISO 27001, we break this down further on our SOC 2 page.
Hear from our satisfied clients. They’ve experienced enhanced cybersecurity posture and peace of mind with our comprehensive services.
Web VAPT Resources include:
This is the first report that includes screening data.
This is the final report that includes testing data .
This is the first report that includes Vulnerability data.
Stay informed with our latest insights and industry trends. Explore our blog and resource center for valuable cybersecurity knowledge.
Find quick solutions to your most common queries here.
We dig into how your app behaves, both from the outside and, if needed, with limited access. That usually means login flows, user roles, how data moves around, APIs, session handling—basically anything that could be a door for an attacker. And if there’s something specific you’re worried about, we’ll look at that too.
No, not unless we agree upfront to push limits (and we usually don’t). We steer clear of anything that could take a system down or interrupt your users. If you’ve got a staging or test environment, even better—we’ll run the heavier stuff there.
It really comes down to how your application is built. For something clean and straightforward, we’re often done in three to five business days. But if it’s loaded with custom roles, third-party add-ons, or a heavy API layer, it might take a bit more time. Before we start, we’ll walk through your setup and give you a realistic timeline—no guesswork, no surprises.
The report gives you a prioritized list of findings, broken down by severity. You’ll see what the issue is, where we found it, why it matters, and how you can fix it. Screenshots, steps to reproduce, remediation notes—it’s all there. And there’s a clean summary at the top that you can actually share.
Absolutely. We’ve worked with clients going through SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR—you name it. Our reports are written with that in mind, and we also provide an attestation letter if you need it. Auditors like having something real they can point to.
Once a year is a good minimum. But if you’re releasing a big new feature, onboarding a major client, or going through an audit—that’s a good time too. It’s less about the calendar and more about when your risk changes.
Totally up to you. Some teams want the whole stack covered. Others just want us to look at the login flow or a new API. We’ll help you figure out what makes sense based on where you feel exposed.
If the scope is clear, we can usually get rolling in a day or two. And if you’ve got a deadline breathing down your neck, let us know—we’ve made tight timelines work before.
Absolutely. Scans are a good start—they check for obvious problems. But they don’t think. A proper test involves people using their brains, creativity, and experience to dig into how your app really works—and how it could be broken. It’s the difference between an X-ray and a hands-on exam.
We’ve tested everything from barebones landing pages to full-blown platforms with crazy API stacks and edge-case user roles. If your app opens in a browser, has users clicking around, or talks to anything over the web—we’re good. Doesn’t matter if it’s a React dashboard or a legacy PHP setup, we’ve probably dealt with it (or something messier).
We specialize in Cyber Security Consultancy. Cyberguardians was established in 2020 under the guidance of Mr. Anshul Patidar.
11/65 Malviya Nagar Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302017
Cyber Guardians Inc Suite A117 1770 S Randall Road Geneva, Illinois 60134
